"Barrett's connection to the old papers was becoming more than simply technical. It was emotional. He detected life in them. He once found the imprint of a person's thumb on a page in a Renaissance book. 'Maybe the papermaker was rushing to fill an order, and grabbed the corner too firmly,' he said. 'To me, that fingerprint marked the sheet with a humanity of the person who made it. I could feel his presence.'James Galvin, a poet who teaches at the Iowa Writer's Workshop, occasionally feels the need to send his students a wake-up call. When this happens, Galvin calls Barrett...and asks him to send over one sheet of paper per student. 'I describe the paper to the students,' Galvin says, 'and I talk about the care, knowledge and aesthetic wisdom that went into making it. Then I tell them to go home and write something on it that makes it more interesting than it is when it's blank.'"-Mark Levine, from Cellulose Hero, New York Times Magazine
There is such a love for process, history, and the sanctity of material in this article. It was written without cynicism and venerates the handmade object as a layered and vital object in our history. It asks, where is the future of the historical handmade paper headed, and who is helping it survive? The question is as essential as asking what is the future of the book? Is it becoming an obsolete object that will be a luxury item in a digitized age?
The music industry faced a similar conundrum as their product became digital and it was an industry in decline for some time. Publishers face the same crisis as they are being written (pardon the pun) out of the equation when it comes to getting books, or words, into readers' hands. The newspaper, phone, and photography worlds have all had to make massive shifts in their business models to remain relevant. Who buys a dictionary anymore or writes a letter on paper? The postal industry is in its death throes due to technology's steady march. Jonathan Franzen wrote:
"The ultimate goal of technology, the telos in the techne, is to replace a natural world that's indifferent to our wishes - a world of hurricanes and hardships, and breakable hearts, a world of resistance - with a world so responsive to our wishes as to be, effectively, a mere extension of ourselves."
What are we sacrificing to have the objects we love: books, pictures, letters, music, and communication instantly attainable but without any concrete physical presence? Can we afford to be cynical about embracing handmade objects no matter what their provenance or worth? Perhaps I am preaching to the choir, or maybe not. Cynicism towards the mainstream craft world, the purveyors of paint your own pottery, the Etsy crowd, and the Michaels Craft world should perhaps be replaced with sincerity and approval. I'm just making an argument, here, and perhaps that is a portion of what we do here in Graduate School, argue over the fine points.
VS.
Thanks for reading and have a good week.










